Tweet
So OK, some say if x amount of exogenous test equals y amount of blood total test levels, then it can be figured that 2x = 2y blood levels, 10x = 10y blood levels, etc. Case in point would be the Dallas situation. They say to have the 50k blood level that he had, he would have to been taking somewhere in the 6-8k mgs ew to get there. This would be the linear way of thinking, and "seems" to make sense at first glance and quick math.
Now check this out. I remember a vet/mod over at WCBB recently posting that when he was taking 400mg ew of test, his blood levels was around 1200. I replied asking if that was a typo, and he said no, that it was correct, that test gave him much lower blood levels than most. Case in point, when I was running 500mg ew years ago, my blood level was over 4500 - which is actually pretty ballpark from bloods & doses I've read over the years. Now also keep in mind this is only 2 guys being sampled - imagine you scale that up to the millions worldwide running PED's, of just HOW dramatic that spectrum would be.
You might have some genetic freaks out there with blood levels of 10k ng/dl on 500mg ew, or some with still under 1000 on that same dose.
So I guess that what people say about Dallas is only speculation, and no way in hell one can know how test (or an other AAS for that matter) will affect someone else's blood levels. Maybe Bob can take 500mg ew and have 2000ng/dl, maybe Jim can take the same amount and be 6000. So apparently nothing is linear with the #'s here.
So now, would the guy who takes a low amount and have blood levels much higher than most would at that amount be considered a hyper-responder? Would those #'s translate to hyper growth at a much lower dose than most? Aka Kevin Levrone? Let's speculate that Kevin could take 500mg ew and have blood levels @ 8000 ng/dl. Or Dallas. That means he could have been taking more like 3000mg ew to reach a blood level of 50k, and not the 6000-8000mg ew as purported. OR, do you think being a hyper-responder has nothing to do with the #'s? I find this topic interesting.
Now check this out. I remember a vet/mod over at WCBB recently posting that when he was taking 400mg ew of test, his blood levels was around 1200. I replied asking if that was a typo, and he said no, that it was correct, that test gave him much lower blood levels than most. Case in point, when I was running 500mg ew years ago, my blood level was over 4500 - which is actually pretty ballpark from bloods & doses I've read over the years. Now also keep in mind this is only 2 guys being sampled - imagine you scale that up to the millions worldwide running PED's, of just HOW dramatic that spectrum would be.
You might have some genetic freaks out there with blood levels of 10k ng/dl on 500mg ew, or some with still under 1000 on that same dose.So I guess that what people say about Dallas is only speculation, and no way in hell one can know how test (or an other AAS for that matter) will affect someone else's blood levels. Maybe Bob can take 500mg ew and have 2000ng/dl, maybe Jim can take the same amount and be 6000. So apparently nothing is linear with the #'s here.
So now, would the guy who takes a low amount and have blood levels much higher than most would at that amount be considered a hyper-responder? Would those #'s translate to hyper growth at a much lower dose than most? Aka Kevin Levrone? Let's speculate that Kevin could take 500mg ew and have blood levels @ 8000 ng/dl. Or Dallas. That means he could have been taking more like 3000mg ew to reach a blood level of 50k, and not the 6000-8000mg ew as purported. OR, do you think being a hyper-responder has nothing to do with the #'s? I find this topic interesting.
Comment