Peak-Muscle.com  

Welcome to the Peak-Muscle.com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Come join us in on one of the best online fitness communities. We have 16,000 members that are likeminded towards a fitness, bodybuilding lifestyle. Registration is free and only takes but a few minutes. By joining our free community you will have access to communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to create threads to discuss and or create a fitness regimen. Or just bounce ideas off of some very knowledgeable members. So don't miss out. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Peak-Muscle.com > Anabolic Steroid Discussion > Post cycle therapy
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2011, 08:13 PM   #1
fastR6
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Nolva vs. Clomid

Here's an interesting article about the benefits of Nolva over Clomid by William Llewellyn


"I have received a lot of heat lately about my preference for Nolvadex over Clomid, which I hold for all purposes of use (in the bodybuilding world anyway); as an anti-estrogen, an HDL (good) cholesterol-supporting drug, and as a testosterone-stimulating compound. Most people use Nolvadex to combat gynecomastia over Clomid anyway, so that is an easy sell. And for cholesterol, well, most bodybuilders unfortunately pay little attention to this important issue, so by way of disinterest, another easy opinion to discuss. But when it comes to using Nolvadex for increasing endogenous testosterone release, bodybuilders just do not want to hear it. They only seem to want Clomid. I can only guess that this is based on a long rooted misunderstanding of the actions of the two drugs. In this article I would therefore like to discuss the specifics for these two agents, and explain clearly the usefulness of Nolvadex for the specific purpose of increasing testosterone production.

Clomid and Nolvadex

I am not sure how Clomid and Nolvadex became so separated in the minds of bodybuilders. They certainly should not be. Clomid and Nolvadex are both anti-estrogens belonging to the same group of triphenylethylene compounds. They are structurally related and specifically classified as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with mixed agonistic and antagonistic properties. This means that in certain tissues they can block the effects of estrogen, by altering the binding capacity of the receptor, while in others they can act as actual estrogens, activating the receptor. In men, both of these drugs act as anti-estrogens in their capacity to oppose the negative feedback of estrogens on the hypothalamus and stimulate the heightened release of GnRH (Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone). lh - leutenizing hormone - output by the pituitary will be increased as a result, which in turn can increase the level of testosterone by the testes. Both drugs do this, but for some reason bodybuilders persist in thinking that Clomid is the only drug good at stimulating testosterone. What you will find with a little investigation however is that not only is Nolvadex useful for the same purpose, it should actually be the preferred agent of the two.

Pituitary Sensitivity to GnRH

Studies conducted in the late 1970's at the University of Ghent in Belgium make clear the advantages of using Nolvadex instead of Clomid for increasing testosterone levels (1). Here, researchers looked the effects of Nolvadex and Clomid on the endocrine profiles of normal men, as well as those suffering from low sperm counts (oligospermia). For our purposes, the results of these drugs on hormonally normal men are obviously the most relevant. What was found, just in the early parts of the study, was quite enlightening. Nolvadex, used for 10 days at a dosage of 20mg daily, increased serum testosterone levels to 142% of baseline, which was on par with the effect of 150mg of Clomid daily for the same duration (the testosterone increase was slightly, but not significantly, better for Clomid). We must remember though that this is the effect of three 50mg tablets of Clomid. With the price of both a 50mg Clomid and 20mg Nolvadex typically very similar, we are already seeing a cost vs. results discrepancy forming that strongly favors the Nolvadex side.

But something more interesting is happening. Researchers were also conducting GnRH stimulation tests before and after various points of treatment with Nolvadex and Clomid, and the two drugs had markedly different results. These tests involved infusing patients with 100mcg of GnRH and measuring the output of pituitary lh - leutenizing hormone - in response. The focus of this test is to see how sensitive the pituitary is to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone. The more sensitive the pituitary, the more lh - leutenizing hormone - will be released. The tests showed that after ten days of treatment with Nolvadex, pituitary sensitivity to GnRH increased slightly compared to pre-treated values. This is contrast to 10 days of treatment with 150mg Clomid, which was shown to consistently DECREASE pituitary sensitivity to GnRH (more lh - leutenizing hormone - was released before treatment). As the study with Nolvadex progresses to 6 weeks, pituitary sensitivity to GnRH was significantly higher than pre-treated or 10-day levels. At this point the same 20mg dosage was also raising testosterone and lh - leutenizing hormone - levels to an average of 183% and 172% of base values, respectively, which again is measurably higher than what was noted 10 days into therapy. Within 10 days of treatment Clomid is already exerting an effect that is causing the pituitary to become slightly desensitized to GnRH, while prolonged use of Nolvadex serves only to increase pituitary sensitivity to this hormone. That is not to say Clomid won't increase testosterone if taken for the same 6 week time period. Quite the opposite is true. But we are, however, noticing an advantage in Nolvadex.


Clomiphene (Clomid) is manufactured by www.APXlabs.com. Each pouch contains 20 tabs, each tab is 50mg.

The Estrogen Clomid

The above discrepancies are likely explained by differences in the estrogenic nature of the two compounds. The researchers' clearly support this theory when commenting in their paper, "The difference in response might be attributable to the weak intrinsic estrogenic effect of Clomid, which in this study manifested itself by an increase in transcortin and testosterone/estradiol-binding globulin [sex hormone binding globulin ] levels; this increase was not observed after Tamoxifen treatment". In reviewing other theories later in the paper, such as interference by increased androgen or estrogen levels, they persist in noting that increases in these hormones were similar with both drug treatments, and state that," ?a role of the intrinsic estrogenic activity of Clomid which is practically absent in Tamoxifen seems the most probable explanation".

Although these two are related anti-estrogens, they appear to act very differently at different sites of action. Nolvadex seems to be strongly anti-estrogenic at both the hypothalamus and pituitary, which is in contrast to Clomid, which although a strong anti-estrogen at the hypothalamus, seems to exhibit weak estrogenic activity at the pituitary. To find further support for this we can look at an in-vitro animal study published in the American Journal of Physiology in February 1981 (2). This paper looks at the effects of Clomid and Nolvadex on the GnRH stimulated release of lh - leutenizing hormone - from cultured rat pituitary cells. In this paper, it was noted that incubating cells with Clomid had a direct estrogenic effect on cultured pituitary cell sensitivity, exerting a weaker but still significant effect compared to est
radiol. Nolvadex on the other hand did not have any significant effect on lh - leutenizing hormone - response. Furthermore it mildly blocked the effects of estrogen when both were incubated in the same culture.

Conclusion

To summarize the above research succinctly, Nolvadex is the more purely anti-estrogenic of the two drugs, at least where the hpta - hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis - (Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testicular Axis) is concerned. This fact enables Nolvadex to offer the male bodybuilder certain advantages over Clomid. This is especially true at times when we are looking to restore a balanced hpta - hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis - , and would not want to desensitize the pituitary to GnRH. This could perhaps slow recovery to some extent, as the pituitary would require higher amounts of hypothalamic GnRH in the presence of Clomid in order to get the same level of lh - leutenizing hormone - stimulation.

Nolvadex also seems preferred from long-term use, for those who find anti-estrogens effective enough at raising testosterone levels to warrant using as anabolics. Here Nolvadex would seem to provide a better and more stable increase in testosterone levels, and likely will offer a similar or greater effect than Clomid for considerably less money. The potential rise in sex hormone binding globulin levels with Clomid, supported by other research (3), is also cause for concern, as this might work to allow for comparably less free active testosterone compared to Nolvadex as well. Ultimately both drugs are effective anti-estrogens for the prevention of gynecomastia and elevation of endogenous testosterone."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 09:27 PM   #2
liftsiron
Administrator
 
liftsiron's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cimmeria
Posts: 18,386
liftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant future
Bill L has a lot of good reads thanks for posting.
__________________
ADMIN/OWNER@Peak-Muscle
liftsiron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2011, 10:51 PM   #3
alluprbdy
Vet
 
alluprbdy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 549
alluprbdy will become famous soon enoughalluprbdy will become famous soon enough
Nolva FTW
__________________
R.I.P. MASSWITHCLASS
R.I.P. INCREDIBLEHAWK
alluprbdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 12:50 PM   #4
t-diddz
Registered User
 
t-diddz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 25
t-diddz is on a distinguished road
Interesting. Great info! thanks
t-diddz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 06:00 PM   #5
BigSickD
Vet
 
BigSickD's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Halfway House
Posts: 2,720
BigSickD is just really niceBigSickD is just really niceBigSickD is just really niceBigSickD is just really nice
Thanks dude good read..
__________________
BigSickD does not actually exist. He is the alter ego of a punkass 17yo kid that doesn't even workout.
BigSickD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 03:12 AM   #6
Freezerdude
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Just seen this thanks bro..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 07:55 PM   #7
JoeHammer
Vet
 
JoeHammer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 101
JoeHammer is on a distinguished road
i hate when people say "anti-estrogen", hell its a synthetic form of estrogen basically.
JoeHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 12:48 PM   #8
Shovel
VET
 
Shovel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 2,772
Shovel is a splendid one to beholdShovel is a splendid one to beholdShovel is a splendid one to beholdShovel is a splendid one to beholdShovel is a splendid one to beholdShovel is a splendid one to beholdShovel is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeHammer View Post
i hate when people say "anti-estrogen", hell its a synthetic form of estrogen basically.
You're just jealous cause Anthony Roberts didn't write this.
__________________
Semper Fi
Shovel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 01:04 PM   #9
ROCKETW19
Vet
 
ROCKETW19's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 179
ROCKETW19 is on a distinguished road
Sorry fast did nt read it but I already agree nolva is better than Clomid for PCT
but i am also super old scholl and i use both just cuz.

this read must be new cuz WL used to always post clomid in his PCTs
ROCKETW19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 01:18 PM   #10
liftsiron
Administrator
 
liftsiron's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cimmeria
Posts: 18,386
liftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant futureliftsiron has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeHammer View Post
i hate when people say "anti-estrogen", hell its a synthetic form of estrogen basically.
No it's not it's a estrogen receptor blocker and works by attaching to the E receptor so that E has no where to attach and can't work. A synthetic estrogen would do the exact same thing as E. Like steroids which are synthetic test and work like endo test.
__________________
ADMIN/OWNER@Peak-Muscle
liftsiron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 08:00 PM   #11
JoeHammer
Vet
 
JoeHammer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 101
JoeHammer is on a distinguished road
the "basically" was used loosley, its obviously close structuraly.
JoeHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 12:14 PM   #12
Bigbench1
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Because of their different structures and effects on the pit gland and sensitivity, it makes for a great combo. Taking 20mgs nolva for 4-6 weeks (am) and 50mgs clom 3 weeks (pm) work amazingly to bring LH levels as high as possible quickly and without risk of desensitizing
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 10:06 PM   #13
FB31T
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Awesome! I have nolva on hand for my PCT and this makes me even happier that I went with the nolva over clomid haha, thanks for the article
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 09:38 PM   #14
TwoGunsNYC
Registered User
 
TwoGunsNYC's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 17
TwoGunsNYC is on a distinguished road
What would the Nolva PCT look like for 6+ month cycles...also after the use of HCG. Same old 20mg/day with no clomid for 40 days or so?
TwoGunsNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 11:28 PM   #15
ERLCHEMS
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by liftsiron View Post
No it's not it's a estrogen receptor blocker and works by attaching to the E receptor so that E has no where to attach and can't work. A synthetic estrogen would do the exact same thing as E. Like steroids which are synthetic test and work like endo test.
actually, youre both techincally correct. They are called SELECTIVE estrogen receptor modulators because in some tissues they do in fact act as estrogens, while in others (mainly breast and hypothalamus) they are estrogen antagonist (aka- estrogen blocker)
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.