Reports of blindness in men using Viagra, Cialis

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liftsiron
    Administrator
    • Nov 2003
    • 18443

    Reports of blindness in men using Viagra, Cialis

    Men's Health

    Reports of blindness in men using Viagra, Cialis
    FDA probing, stresses no evidence yet impotence drugs to blameMSNBC staff and news service reports
    Updated: 11:49 a.m. ET May 27, 2005WASHINGTON - Federal health officials are examining rare reports of blindness among some men using the impotence drugs Viagra and Cialis, a disclosure that comes at a time when the drug industry can ill afford negative publicity about another class of blockbuster medicines.



    The Food and Drug Administration still is investigating, but has no evidence yet that the drug is to blame, said spokeswoman Susan Cruzan.

    This type of blindness is called NAION, or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. It is a common optic nerve disease in adults over age 50 and can occur in men who are diabetic, have high blood pressure or high cholesterol, the same risk factors that can cause impotence.

    The FDA has 42 reports of the blindness, 38 among users of Viagra and four among users of Cialis. There were no cases reported among users of Levitra, the third impotence drug.

    “We take this seriously,” said FDA’s Cruzan.

    The FDA is in discussions about the reported cases with the manufacturers of the three drugs in case there is a problem with the class of medication and to see if changes need to be made to their labels.




    Side effects include vision problems
    Eli Lilly & Co., which manufactures Cialis, refers to vision problems as an uncommon side effect, including seeing a blue tinge or having difficulty telling the difference between blue and green. “These are not all the side effects of Cialis,” it says on its Web site.

    Viagra manufacturer Pfizer Inc. also refers on its Web site to some vision issues: “Less common are bluish or blurred vision, or being sensitive to light. These may occur for a short time.” That language had been available before the current inquiry.

    Pfizer issued a statement Friday, saying "There is no evidence that NAION occured more frequently in men taking Viagra than men of similar age and health who did not take Viagra."

    Pfizer spokesman Daniel Watts also confirmed that the drugmaker was in discussions with the FDA about adding a disclosure to Viagra’s label to say that in rare cases, men taking Viagra had developed blindness.

    However, he said there is no proof that Viagra caused the blindness. He said that men who take Viagra often have high blood pressure and high cholesterol, which are also associated with the conditions that can cause blindness.

    Levitra is sold in the United States by GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Schering-Plough Corp. and overseas by Bayer AG.

    Viagra was approved by the government in 1998. It may aid in the treatment of enlarged hearts that can result from high blood pressure, tests on animals indicate.

    Levitra was approved in August 2003, and Cialis in November of that year.

    There have been no reports connecting Levitra to blindness, said Michael Fleming, a spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline PLC. “We are confident about the safety of our product,” said Fleming.

    Viagra, approved to treat erectile dysfunction, should not be used by men with heart conditions whose doctors have warned them not to have sex. Also, patients taking drugs that contain nitrates have been warned not to take Viagra because of sudden, unsafe drops in blood pressure.

    The drug’s label also warns of erections lasting longer than four hours, painful erections lasting longer than six hours, headache, flushed skin and vision problems.

    Pfizer Inc. said in its most recent quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that sales of the drug rose 5 percent — to $438 million in the first quarter of the year. Pfizer also said at the time that Viagra had a 68 percent worldwide market share.

    Viagra sales have been under pressure from new competitors Cialis and Levitra, with revenue sinking 11 percent last year to $1.68 billion from $1.88 billion.

    Approved too quickly?
    Doctors and patients have become increasingly wary of the downsides of prescription drugs after Merck & Co. yanked its pain reliever Vioxx from the market last year because of its potentially lethal side effects.

    Merck potentially faces thousands of lawsuits over Vioxx and analysts have estimated its liability may reach $18 billion.

    Pfizer was asked to remove its pain reliever Bextra from the market because of its side effects and sales of its other arthritis drug Celebrex are falling. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all fall into a category of drugs known as Cox-2 inhibitors.

    Industry critics have been demanding that drug companies conduct more post-marketing studies in order to do a better job of discoving side effects once drugs hit the market.

    For more than two decades, Americans have mostly pressed for quicker approval of what they hope can be lifesaving drugs for such diseases as AIDS and cancer. But many now are wondering if medicines — a $200 billion industry annually — are coming out too fast and doing too much harm.

    Viagra also is at the center of controversy over Medicaid’s payment for prescriptions of the drug to convicted sex offenders in New York and other states.
    ADMIN/OWNER@Peak-Muscle
  • ronb
    VET
    • Sep 2004
    • 677

    #2
    42 cases out of how many millions who use the drugs is not alot although losing ones eye sight is extreme. it seems like there may be more coincidence in these cases. i can see the lawyers licking their chops now.
    Failure is not an option

    It's hard to kiss the lips at night that chew your ass out all day long.

    Life can be summed up in one four letter word .. NEXT!

    Former Admin@

    Comment

    • liftsiron
      Administrator
      • Nov 2003
      • 18443

      #3
      Originally posted by ronb
      42 cases out of how many millions who use the drugs is not alot although losing ones eye sight is extreme. it seems like there may be more coincidence in these cases. i can see the lawyers licking their chops now.


      I'm not getting to worried over it.
      ADMIN/OWNER@Peak-Muscle

      Comment

      • powerlifter
        VET
        • May 2004
        • 170

        #4
        Originally posted by liftsiron
        I'm not getting to worried over it.

        me neither LI - there are always a few chicken littles claiming the sky is falling - it's like lumping in Naprosyn with the Cox- 2 inhibitors - I don't buy it
        Anything I say is for educational purposes only, and is not intended to diagnose or treat. Please consult with your medical practitioner, as they will be able to see and more accurately gauge the depth of the problem...my advice shall be meant as suggestions only, as advice and opinions can vary widely amongst professionals.

        Comment

        • liftsiron
          Administrator
          • Nov 2003
          • 18443

          #5
          Originally posted by powerlifter
          me neither LI - there are always a few chicken littles claiming the sky is falling - it's like lumping in Naprosyn with the Cox- 2 inhibitors - I don't buy it

          I'm with you
          ADMIN/OWNER@Peak-Muscle

          Comment

          • Fayde
            Registered User
            • Aug 2003
            • 448

            #6
            Isn't that from whacking off waaaaaayyyyy too much
            ~Pain heals, Glory is Forever!
            ~There is no try; there is only do or do not...

            Comment

            Working...