Tweet
Science
The essential spirit of modern scholarship could be described as what happens when radical skepticism meets “scientific” dogmatism.
The philosophy of modern liberalism is neo-positivism, being a supposed empirical approach to intellectual ideas.
Science itself is therefore the only supposed arbiter of values, creating an alarmingly vapid circular model.
That neo-liberalism has completely commandeered and derailed many “scientific” endeavors is a foregone conclusion after the exposure of the astounding socialist hoax called Global Warming.
But such dishonesty will continue to be sold in the name of various studies, such as Evolution, environmentalism, and the like.
It is no coincidence that Marx claimed all his ideas were the quintessence of science, which he appears to have done merely to push his theories past any criticism.
But science’s formerly pristine method has been handed over to the godlike State so that order and values can be instilled in the blind masses.
The essential spirit of modern scholarship could be described as what happens when radical skepticism meets “scientific” dogmatism.
The philosophy of modern liberalism is neo-positivism, being a supposed empirical approach to intellectual ideas.
Science itself is therefore the only supposed arbiter of values, creating an alarmingly vapid circular model.
That neo-liberalism has completely commandeered and derailed many “scientific” endeavors is a foregone conclusion after the exposure of the astounding socialist hoax called Global Warming.
But such dishonesty will continue to be sold in the name of various studies, such as Evolution, environmentalism, and the like.
It is no coincidence that Marx claimed all his ideas were the quintessence of science, which he appears to have done merely to push his theories past any criticism.
But science’s formerly pristine method has been handed over to the godlike State so that order and values can be instilled in the blind masses.
Comment