Lots of bodybuilders are really confused about how many sets to do, what TUT should be and how many lifts to do to add mass. Part of the confusion is because the BB'er uses pretty horrendous sources of information such as muscle magazines, or some of the forums where in realty, the average poster is a 16-22 year old kid that is just parroting what the last parrot said. And to make matters worse, everyone does respond different so what works for good old Fred may be totally unsuitable for Joe.
Some good common sense advice comes from Chad Waterbury, who recommends simply doing 24-50 total REPS per muscle group for optimal mass gains. When I read this the first time I compared it to my frequently prescribed sets and reps for lifters and realized he was right on the money IMO.
Now if you are working primarily on strength, you can go lower and still get a good amount of size to go along with it, and in many cases, this is preferred as attaining a solid strength foundation should be what the beginning and intermediate trainee focuses on initially, but even with that said, the 24-50 rep guideline works very well indeed for a good percentage of the lifters out there for both size and strength gains.
Iron Addict
Some good common sense advice comes from Chad Waterbury, who recommends simply doing 24-50 total REPS per muscle group for optimal mass gains. When I read this the first time I compared it to my frequently prescribed sets and reps for lifters and realized he was right on the money IMO.
Now if you are working primarily on strength, you can go lower and still get a good amount of size to go along with it, and in many cases, this is preferred as attaining a solid strength foundation should be what the beginning and intermediate trainee focuses on initially, but even with that said, the 24-50 rep guideline works very well indeed for a good percentage of the lifters out there for both size and strength gains.
Iron Addict
Comment